DESKTOP VIRTUALIZATION AND STORAGE SOLUTIONS EVOLVE TO SUPPORT MOBILE WORKERS ABD CONSUMER DEVICES.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Desktop virtualization initiatives have become part of strategic discussions in most companies because of market trends such as the ever-increasing mobile workforce and the ever-growing swath of "bring your own device" (BYOD) users. Desktop virtualization is gaining attention and interest at the highest levels in organizations.

IT and line-of-business leaders are investigating desktop virtualization because it can benefit both desktop operations and workforce productivity in the following ways:

  • Increase workforce flexibility. IT can empower users with teleworking programs and mobile users with desktop images on their own devices.
  • Leverage the latest mobile device technologies. By abstracting underlying end-user devices and focusing on the application, IT can offer users more flexibility by making productivity apps available on devices such as tablets, smartphones, and alternate PC platforms such as Mac OS X and Linux.
  • Adapt to business change. IT can enable new branch expansion, offshoring, and merger and acquisition (M&A) initiatives with higher security and lower costs

A prevalent approach to desktop virtualization is the centralized virtual desktop (CVD, aka VDI) — where the desktop OS is abstracted from the endpoint device and run as a virtual machine in the datacenter. While this approach centralizes and streamlines management, adoption has been a challenge because the technology is expensive to deploy. Using just this one model also limits flexibility, particularly as the workforce becomes increasingly mobile.

Flexible desktop virtualization solutions offer a very different value proposition as vendors realize that no single technology model can address an entire organization's needs. These solutions offer multiple delivery models to virtualize desktops and applications, with different models best suited for different use cases — all within a single solution suite. A good example is Citrix XenDesktop with FlexCast, which offers multiple delivery models to virtualize both desktops and application sessions.

Storage remains the most complex component of the infrastructure necessary to support a virtual desktop deployment. Because addressing the needs for different user types adds complexity at the storage layer, desktop virtualization vendors such as Citrix were prudent to engage in partnerships with leading storage solution providers such as NetApp. Their efforts in leveraging the storage optimization, data management, and scalability capabilities of storage platforms are yielding benefits — such solutions are more nimble, flexible, and scalable. At the same time, they offer exceptionally low costs per desktop without sacrificing performance.

SITUATION OVERVIEW

Desktop virtualization is rapidly growing and expanding to new devices as organizations seek to adapt to new user trends and increase productivity by enabling mobile work styles. Worldwide revenue for the virtual client computing (VCC) market was $2.4 billion in 2011, growing nearly 12% year over year. IDC sees the market growing to $3.5 billion through 2016, representing a five-year CAGR of 7.6%. It is important to note that the virtual client computing market is more than just CVDs. In 2011, CVDs accounted for only 25% of the VCC revenue, while virtual user session (VUS) software that can share desktop or application sessions and includes products

such as Citrix XenApp accounted for 60%. Also included in the VCC market are distributed virtual desktops (DVDs), which are centrally managed but locally executed solutions such as Citrix XenClient and application virtualization products such as Microsoft App-V.

In a recent study conducted by IDC, over 65.4% of respondents said they currently have virtual desktops, with an additional 25.4% expecting to deploy in the next year. Interest in and implementations of VDI are growing definitively, with only 8.6% of respondents saying they have no plans to deploy. Estimates put the total number of virtual desktop instances deployed in 2012 at over 14 million.

The rapidly changing virtualization landscape continues to have a significant impact on storage systems. In 2010, 41.8% of external storage systems capacity was attached to virtualized environments. IDC expects 2014 to be the crossover year in which more storage capacity will be shipped to virtualized environments than to non-virtualized environments — a good chunk of this capacity will be for desktop virtualization infrastructures. This is because overhead-free storage optimization technologies as well as reduced component prices are making external storage systems more attractive for desktop virtualization environments. External storage systems provide high levels of resiliency, availability (up to 6-9s uptime), and data protection that their direct-attached counterparts cannot offer. IDC forecasts that by 2016, storage attached to virtualized x86 workloads will be 71.1% of external storage systems capacity.

MARKET ACCELERATORS

Storage solutions that support desktop virtualization environments have to be flexible in terms of interfaces and support the ultimate goal of keeping per-desktop costs low without compromising performance, availability, or scale. It is now possible to decrease the cost of desktop virtualization per desktop significantly to achieve a quick ROI; however, it requires that the appropriate infrastructure be deployed up front. Storage vendors are rapidly making their storage solutions scalable, cost-effective, and desktop virtualization friendly, working in partnership with desktop virtualization vendors such as Citrix and VMware to modify relevant features. It is important to note that not all storage architectures are automatically CVD friendly, and for several storage vendors, developing this support required a fairly significant effort. Two cases that illustrate such challenges are the ability to provide multiple data interfaces and the ability to deploy multiple storage optimization features concurrently in an effort to drive down costs.

REQUIREMENTS FOR DESKTOP VIRTUALIZATION

It is also important to note that not all desktop virtualization solutions are equal. Therefore, storage configurations also vary widely from one solution to another. What may work for one virtual desktop delivery model may not work for another. This underscores the need for tight partnerships between storage, networking, compute, and hypervisor vendors in an effort to crisply define what these configurations should look like and what requirements they are based on.

To understand what infrastructure is required, organizations need to understand the number and different types of users who will be supported and the different types of VCC technologies that will be deployed. The selection of an appropriate desktop virtualization solution is an important decision that should factor in the use cases for buyers. These factors include mobility, BYOD policies, security- and policy-based application access, and flexible deployment models. With that in mind, IT can configure the appropriate servers, storage, and networking. In addition, IDC has consistently found that the storage solution has been the most consequential part of the physical infrastructure because it provides the backbone for multiple desktop images to boot off and access data. The storage solution needs to support performance on demand, be scalable, provide continuous access, be secure, and offer integrated data protection — and do all of this in a cost-effective manner.

End – User Requirements

The consumerization of IT and the rapid rise of BYOD are dramatically changing the dynamic between IT and end users. IT no longer has absolute control over an end user's environment like it used to. End users are demanding rapid response times from IT and an agile workplace to take advantage of the latest software. And if IT cannot support the end user, the end user will circumvent IT. This can be great for productivity but can also create a governance and compliance nightmare.

Desktop virtualization offers a solution that can provide users with the agility they demand and the compliance IT needs. Centralizing the management of desktops by virtualizing them also improves the speed and cadence to patch, update, and fix desktops. And providing virtual desktops and desktop applications to nearly any device, anywhere, anytime through a secure, encrypted container enables end users to choose which devices they want to use and IT to enforce governance.

Simplified IT Administration

CIOs everywhere are pushing IT departments to offer a solution to overcome limited workplace flexibility and securely offer mobility, including access to corporate assets on user-owned devices. They are demanding an alternative to the distributed asset-centric mindset that is a drag on IT productivity. For example, an ongoing but ever-shrinking asset refresh cycle with limited gains; a siloed delivery of desktops, apps, and data; and changes that take days to minimize downtime work against productivity.

Thus, the desktop virtualization solution should provide an alternative without breaking the bank. A key consideration is to right size the infrastructure. Oversizing can deliver the performance required, but it is expensive and results in excess capacity during nonpeak periods. On the other hand, undersizing doesn't deliver the performance required and results in poor user experience, which means IT is back to square one with the old model.

Infrastructure Requirements

To meet the demanding needs of today's end users, specifically a mobile multi device workforce, the virtual desktop infrastructure has to be designed to function seamlessly. In other words, the infrastructure components (i.e., compute, networking, and storage layers) need to work in unison with each other and with the hypervisor solution to offer an agile, scalable, and cost-effective infrastructure that is aligned with user and administrator requirements. From a storage perspective, this means that the solutions need to have the following characteristics:

  • Multiprotocol. Multiple storage protocols are needed for optimal support of all desktop components — OS, applications, user data, and profiles — within a delivery model and across delivery models
  • Low latency. Regardless of the design and regardless of how many desktops are being supported, from a user's perspective, the solution needs to offer near local performance in terms of latency. This requirement is accentuated even more in situations where the users are mobile and access the desktop on the go, in many cases via cellular or wireless networks. External storage solutions, especially when used in shared network environments, introduce latency into the mix depending on what type of data interfaces are used (e.g., NFS versus Fibre Channel or iSCSI), the overhead posed by storage optimization solutions such as deduplication or compression, and the manner in which the disks are configured. The intelligent use of flash as a caching layer or as a storage tier is an important consideration because certain elements of the desktop image accessed can be served from flash cache or tiers, thereby reducing the latency without driving up cost.
  • Performance on demand (extreme burst IOPS). One of the often talked about but frequently misrepresented attributes for storage in VDI stems from multiple virtual machines booting up at the same time and then all users logging in. This purportedly causes the storage system to be hit with a tsunami of read and subsequently write IOPS (it is routine to find a three to five times increase in IOPS during a boot storm). It is then up to the storage system on how to mitigate and manage the resulting bottleneck in terms of how data is served. Several storage vendors have simply added a caching layer to tackle this issue, but the problem is not solved there. Storage vendors also have to alter their fetching and caching algorithms to detect such a storm and pin relevant data sets before it hits the system. This is especially necessary when the boot images are neither cloned nor deduplicated. Pinning data into the cache is not necessary, however, when the images are cloned or deduplicated at the block level. The first read of a shared block will be at disk speed and subsequent reads of the block (for subsequent boot images) will be at cache speed. This may appear to be an easy task, but it is not. This is perhaps one of the biggest challenges with scalability and agility that makes some storage solutions better than others. It needs to be noted that IOPS requirements increase with newer platforms. For example, a Windows 7 deployment is often 110–120% more IOPS intensive than a Windows XP deployment.
  • Storage optimization. Optimization technologies make asset utilization as efficient as possible. As noted previously, one of the biggest inhibitors to the adoption of external disk systems is the cost-effectiveness of the solution. Businesses demand that the solution be able to sustain a low fully-loaded cost per virtual machine without compromising functionality or scalability. One of the ways storage vendors can lower the per-desktop costs of the solution is by heavily leveraging storage optimization technologies such as deduplication, compression, dynamic flash-based tiering, and thin provisioning. Since OS images of virtual desktop images, like their server counterparts, are highly redundant, their combined footprint can be highly optimized by removing the redundant blocks of data. However, the "rehydration" effect should not unduly penalize the storage subsystem. In other words, the storage optimization technologies should function without interfering with the performance or scalability of the overall solution. This is one of the key differentiators for leading desktop virtualization–friendly storage solutions.
  • Cloning for quick duplication of desktop images. As with server virtualization environments, one of the key requirements for desktop virtualization environments is the ability to use the storage system to quickly clone desktop images. One of the challenges businesses face with using internal storage or storage with no data services (such as JBOD arrays) is that the task of cloning images is time consuming and often adds administrative overhead. With storage assisted cloning that is VDI friendly, this task is simpler and faster and, more
  • importantly, does not penalize the storage system in the process. In a large desktop virtualization environment, this task can quickly become a fairly routine operation, so automation capabilities that are integrated with the hypervisor's management UI can add to the differentiating capabilities of the storage solution.
  • Integrated local and geographical data protection. Most businesses are forced to reexamine how they protect or distribute key data components of the virtual desktop infrastructure. For example, desktop images may need to be backed up locally for fast restoration and replicated to another geographic location for disaster recovery. Similarly, to cater to the needs of a mobile workforce, businesses may need to serve certain desktop images locally from a different location. Storage-based data services need to be efficient to handle desktop images and enable quick and granular operational and disaster recovery capabilities.
  • Workload predictability. The storage solution must be designed to handle a highly variable workload

CONCLUSION

Desktop virtualization is enabling businesses to move from PC-centric IT to data-centric and even cloud-centric IT. In the post-PC era of BYOD and BMYOD (bring and manage your own device), IT needs to shift from the PC-centric world of managing and protecting individual PC components, such as hard drives, to a datacenter model where corporate data is centrally stored, managed, and protected; users are given access to the relevant data using their own or assigned devices; and user data management can be centrally governed.

This is a big deal for CIOs as they try to transform their IT departments from asset management outfits to service delivery organizations. A desktop virtualization infrastructure with an agile, scalable, and cost-effective storage solution helps CIOs achieve this metamorphosis and provides low and measurable ROI.

Why Soft Solutions Limited (SSL)?

Soft Solutions Limited (SSL) founded in 1994, has emerged as one of the leading IT solutions and consulting companies in Nigeria.

SSL helps customers address enterprise challenges by providing comprehensive solutions that combines innovative models and technologies with passion to solve business problems.

We deliver technology solutions that are cost effective, easy to use and adaptive to enable next level growth. Our solutions provide the platform for an agile ICT environment that drives an organization towards set objectives. They instantly transform any organization and deliver visible return on Investment. At SSL, we are pragmatic consultants who bring an implementation perspective to all our work. We realize that elegant solutions are meaningless unless they can be translated into sustainable business value.

Soft Solutions Limited partners with Citrix in Nigeria. Citrix Systems, Inc. is the leading provider of virtualization, networking and software as a service technology for more than 230,000 organizations worldwide.

For more information, contact info@ss-limited.com or send a request

Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Introducing SSLCloud HRMS Suite Customized and cost-effective IT solutionsClick here for SSLCloud HR solution